CPE: a good reason to avoid surgery in Spain!

A clear simple study has a stark headline: 16% of admissions to a Spanish surgical ICU carry CPE. This sort of carriage prevalence is at a ‘practice-affecting’ level: the empiric antibiotic choices may be altered and you begin to wonder what is left when the first signs of infection develop in almost 1 in every 5 patients…

The retrospective analysis of CPE carriage identified through a routine admission screening programme was performed on a surgical ICU in a 1300 bed hospital. 254 patients had a rectal screen collected over 2 years (2012-2013), and 41 (16.1%) carried CPE. A total of 46 individual CPE isolates were detected (5 patients carried multiple CPEs); K. pneumoniae (85%) and OXA-48 (76%) predominated. Risk factors associated with the carriage of CPE following multivariable analysis were: 3rd / 4th gen cephalosporins in the past 6 months (with a towering odds ratio of 28!); a beta-lactam or beta-lactamase inhibitor in the past 6 months, abdominal surgery in the past 12 months, and prior digestive / biliary endoscopy. 22 of the 41 patients developed an infection with the same CPE as detected on the rectal screen at the time of ICU admission; the study doesn’t report any outcomes from these studies, unfortunately.

A couple of points of particular concern:

  • The increased risk associated with digestive / biliary endoscopy is a bit of a worry – and makes me wonder about exactly how they are decontaminating their endoscopes, following some high-profile endoscope-associated outbreaks. I was surprised that this hypothesis was not aired in the discussion.
  • They used a pretty crude method to detect carbapenem-resistant bacteria: MacConkey agar plus cefotaxime. In our universal screening study in London, this method detected only 20% of CPE that were grown on chromogenic media. Could it be that the true prevalence of CPE on this unit was 5x higher?? (I certainly hope not, but it was almost certainly higher than detected using these methods.)
  • This study was performed in 2012/2013 – now almost half a decade ago. I can only image that the prevalence of resistant bacteria have increased during this period, as they have in invasive pneumoniae infections reported to EARS-Net from Spain (see the Figure below). There has been a sharp increase in carbapenem-resistance in K. pneumoniae in the national invasive infection dataset reported to EARS-Net since 2012/13 (from 0.8% in 2012 to >2% in 2015)!

Figure: Trends in carbapenem resistance in invasive infections caused by K. pneumoniae in Spain

If you had a quick trip to Spain over Easter, perhaps a rectal swab is in order…

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “CPE: a good reason to avoid surgery in Spain!

  1. Well, 309,000 UK citizens living in spain (not for holidays). 70,000 retired UK citizens use Spain´s doctors and hospitals. Just 81 Spanish pensioners are registered for NHS treatment…
    Perhaps these Kp isolates represent international introductions from other countries …
    Please, see a more recent study about UK hospitals: MBio. 2017 Feb 21;8(1). pii: e01976-16
    Kp is a serious problem, not a joke…

    Like

    • Hi Jose, I certainly did not intend to turn the threat of CPE into a joke. This is an international problem, no doubt about it – although it does seem to be the case that some countries are further along the epi curve than others! Having lived through a large, costly outbreak of CPE in London, I have seen the impact that it can cause first hand. So, no, it is no laughing matter.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s