Toilets as a reservoir for CPE transmission?

Picked up this interesting article in Infection Prevention in Practice suggesting that contaminated toilet fixtures could be a reservoir for CPE transmission. It’s always difficult to disentangle cause and effect when it comes to surface contamination, but the study makes a compelling case that toilets were a reservoir for transmission. The solution? More cleaning and disinfection is required – but also a look at some newer approaches to bathroom disinfection, along the lines of continuous disinfection.

Intro:

Hospital environments are well-documented reservoirs for multidrug-resistant organisms. While sinks and drains have long been implicated in outbreaks, toilets have received less attention despite their potential for aerosolization during flushing. This Danish study focused on the Gastric Surgery Unit, where two ongoing CPE outbreaks were linked to Citrobacter freundii ST18 and Klebsiella oxytoca ST2, both carrying the blaNDM-1 gene. The study asked whether toilets serve as the primary source of transmission, and how genetically related are environmental and patient isolates?

Methods:

This was a longitudinal study without an intervention, tracking patient and environmental contamination on the unit. Over 450 days, the following were undertaken:

  • Weekly rectal swabs for all patients on the unit.
  • Environmental sampling of toilets, drains, and dry surfaces at multiple time points.
  • Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and plasmid profiling using Illumina and Oxford Nanopore platforms.
  • Core genome MLST (cgMLST) for phylogenetic analysis.

Key findings:

  • Three toilets consistently harbored NDM-1-producing K. oxytoca ST2, each forming distinct genomic sub-clades.
  • Four patients later tested positive for isolates genetically related to those found in toilets.
  • No evidence of direct patient-to-patient transmission was detected.
  • Additional sampling of dry surfaces yielded no CPE, reinforcing toilets as the primary reservoir.
  • Interestingly, one toilet lacked a lid—a factor that may have facilitated aerosol spread during flushing, as suggested by prior studies on pathogen dispersal.
  • Environmental isolates carried either a novel IncR plasmid (pKo2) or the pT1 plasmid previously associated with C. freundii outbreaks.
  • cgMLST revealed tight clustering of isolates from the same toilet across time points, confirming persistence.

Limitations:

  • The main limitation of the study is the design itself. Whilst there is compelling evidence from the individual patient timelines that the contaminated toilets were the source of acquisition, we don’t know this for sure. Environmental sampling is always hit and miss, staff were not screened, and patients were ‘only’ screened weekly. Plus, we don’t know whether there was a lag between the point of actual acquisition and when the patients became culture positive.
  • The lack of control or an intervention reinforces the challenges in drawing something definitive from this study.

Implications for practice:

Despite the limitations, the study provides compelling evidence for the role of the inanimate environmental in the spread of CPE. So, we to:

  • Clean and disinfect more frequently and more thoroughly.
  • Use a disinfectant with a good chance of inactivating CPE, even in the presence of soiling (such as peracetic acid or chlorine dioxide).
  • Consider approaches for ‘continuous disinfection’. The big challenge here is that people use toilets all the time! And clearly with an organism that colonises the gut, high levels of contamination will ensue. So, some sort of continuous disinfection approach would help here, be it antimicrobial surfaces, far UV, UVC (when the toilet is vacant), or some other approach.
  • Improved design of our bathrooms to reduce contamination risks.
  • Implement continuous genomic surveillance to ensure we are identifying and rapidly acting on clusters as they emerge.

Summary

This study underscores the potential role of toilets in the transmission dynamics of CPE. While ‘traditional’ cleaning and disinfection protocols remain essential, they may be insufficient when faced with continuous contamination in high-use areas. This feels like an area that would benefit a lot from ‘continuous disinfection’ approaches, improved bathroom design, and genomic surveillance.

Searching for Mpox on surfaces and in the air

Between October 2024 and January 2025, the UK identified eight cases of Clade Ib Monkeypox virus (MPXV), with seven patients admitted to high consequence infectious disease (HCID) centres. A comprehensive environmental sampling study was conducted to assess the extent of MPXV contamination in isolation rooms and anterooms, focusing on both air and surface samples.

Continue reading

Candidozyma auris: an emerging threat

I’ve written this post in preparation for tomorrow’s Journal Club, which will be based on this NEJM review of Candidozyma auris (formerly Candida auris). You can register for Journal Club here (or watch the recording afterwards here).

Continue reading

Antimicrobial surfaces: time to rethink surface disinfection?

As we enter World AMR Awareness Week for 2024, there is an increasing recognition that we are coming towards the end of antibiotics in some settings. Prevention is undoubtedly better than cure. Developing whole new classes of antimicrobial agents is unlikely to dig us out of the AMR mire, but getting better at preventing them is a hugely important part of our response to the AMR threat. Into this context lands today’s study – a randomised intervention study on the impact of introducing an antimicrobial surface coating in an Emergency Department setting. The results were positive, with the antimicrobial surface coating associated with lower levels of microbial contamination. Does this prompt a rethink of our approach to surface disinfection? A reminder that this paper will be the subject of tomorrow’s Journal Club (register here).

Continue reading

What is the difference between hospital hygiene and hospital cleanliness?

This guest post is by Prof Sally Bloomfield, Chairman, International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene (IFH)

At Infection Prevention 2024 in September, I gave a presentation on this issue which I found challenging and thought-provoking to write. I started from the point that environmental hygiene and cleanliness in healthcare settings has 2 fundamentally different functions:

“Hygiene” through practices that reduce risk of exposure of patients, healthcare personnel and visitors to pathogenic microbes“Visual cleanliness” is vital to sustaining patient, visitor and staff perception that high quality care is being delivered
Physical removal and/or disinfection to reduce microbial contamination on environmental surfaces (and air) to an acceptable (safe) levelPhysical removal of dust, soil, etc by mechanical action with or without detergent, until visibly clean
Continue reading

Improving cleaning and disinfection of shared medical equipment: it’s time to ‘CLEEN between’

A fantastic new study from Brett Mitchell’s prolific group in Australia has recently been published in Lancet Infectious Diseases and the results are pretty spectacular. A fairly low cost intervention of an extra 3 hours of cleaning and disinfecting shared medical equipment each day resulted in a whopping 35% reduction in HCAI in a randomised controlled trial. I’m delighted to say that Prof Brett Mitchell will be introducing an IPC Journal Club on this study next Wednesday (register here).

Continue reading

How dirty is your QWERTY?

I was recently involved in a study to examine the microbial profile of computer keyboards in a multi-centre study in the UK. The findings have just been published in the Journal of Hospital Infection

Continue reading

Exploring SARS-CoV-2 hospital surface and air contamination in London

We have just had a study published in Clinical Infectious Diseases exploring the extent and magnitude of hospital surface and air contamination with SARS-CoV-2 during the (first!) peak of COVID-19 in London. The bottom line is that we identified pretty extensive surface and air contamination with SARS-CoV-2 RNA but did not culture viable virus. We concluded that this highlights the potential role of contaminated surfaces and air in the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

Continue reading

The role contaminated surfaces in COVID-19 transmission: a HIS audience-led webinar

The next instalment of the HIS audience-led webinar series is on the role of contaminated surfaces in COVID-19 transmission. I was delighted to be part of the panel for this one:

  • Dr Lena Ciric – Associate Professor in Environmental Engineering, University College London
  • Dr Stephanie Dancer – Consultant Microbiologist, NHS Lanarkshire and Professor of Microbiology, Edinburgh Napier University, Scotland
  • Dr Manjula Meda – Consultant Clinical Microbiologist and Infection Control Doctor, Frimley Park Hospital
  • Dr Jon Otter – Infection prevention and control Epidemiologist, Imperial College London
  • Chair: Dr Surabhi Taori, Consultant microbiologist and infection control doctor, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Here’s the recording:

Continue reading

Developing antimicrobial “smart surfaces” to tackle HCAI and AMR

I participated in a launch event by the Institute of Molecular Science and Engineering (IMSE) at Imperial College London yesterday for a new white paper on developing “smart surfaces” to tackle HCAI and AMR.

Continue reading