In a short, but important Dutch study, the added value of selective pre-enrichment for the detection of ESBL-producing enterobacteriacea (ESBL-E) was evaluated. The authors used their yearly prevalence study to shed more light onto the question if pre-enrichment (using a broth) might be equally improving the performance of ESBL-E detection, as it does with MRSA. While the literature on the topic might be controversial, this straightforward, well-performed study showed that direct culture failed to identify 25.9% (7/27) ESBL-E rectal carriers, which corresponds to 1.2% (7/562) of the screened population. While the overall rate of ESBL-E rectal carriage is not very high (4.8%) this study still demonstrates the importance of improving our methods to detect multi-drug resistant pathogens.
The authors did raise the question that the bacterial-load of the “extra” ESBL-E is probably very low, but conclude that it still may contribute to the spread of ESBL-E. Depending on the individual infection control approach to control ESBL-E, one might have to use both, direct culture and enrichment, since the later will prolong time-to-result by a day.
Reports of future studies on ESBL-E carriage need to be checked for their methods used, since “true rates” might be higher if only direct culture methods are used.
Discover more from Reflections on Infection Prevention and Control
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
